The Foreign Emoluments Clause (Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the US Constitution) is often misunderstood.
It only restricts the acceptance of royal/noble titles to those people who are elected or appointed to any federal "Office of Profit or Trust" (aka elected officials and high-ranking government officials). Any other ordinary US citizen can receive titles from foreign countries and the usage of said titles would only be restricted by the government of the nation issuing them.
As a practical matter, US documents such as driver's licenses or passports would not include such titles so the Count John de Smith of Luxembourg would only show on any US ID as John de Smith. But that does not mean the person does not still have that title.
My point here is the Constitutional restriction does not apply to the Duchess of Sussex nor her children.
Of course it applies. Where an American citizen (Markle, or her two children) may try to insist on a FOREIGN-given and FOREIGN-recognized title being used as part of their name on any official U.S. document.
"Space" on a document is a red herring and bogus contention. There is plenty of "space" on a U.S. passport in order to allow for people's given names (some even have three long ones) and long surnames (some may even be hyphenated). So, that is certainly no "reason" why a title is not appearing. The fact of the matter is it's not appearing due to the correct and widest possible interpretation of the Emoluments Clause.
221
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index