Re: James McClean.
|
You appear to be convinced that his previous tête-à-tête was self defence, I didn’t see it as that, he wasn’t touched and was surrounded by people who could protect him if he was. I am not so convinced but what I see are 2 incidents within a few months involving the same player, as he is the only common denominator in the two incidents it gives me an indication of the players mindset, add to that, that he does tend to court controversy and I make a judgment based on that. Quite a normal way to think would you not say
|