1. The Governor has already chosen someone to serve out Dianne Feinstein's term.
2. Three other California congressional representatives -- Adam Schiff, Barbara Lee and Kate Porter -- are running for the seat in 2024.
3. The Democratic Party does not nominate celebs who have never held any public office to run for a Senate seat and presumably MM would be running as a Democrat. And name recognition is not enough; California is a huge state and you need the party's organization to win elections.
Somebody at the Daily Mail must have been bored one day and decided to think up something crazy.
If people would just ignore the Duke and Duchess of Montecito on and offline we would not have to bother responding to all the nonsense. But I agree a last push by the government to formalise their royal irrelevance could not come soon enough.
If this were a serious report, and not tabloid click bait, maybe. But c'mon! This is just ridiculous! You really believe these "reports"?!
If the duchess is serious about a political career it should be made clear to her that in that scenario she can no longer refer to herself as Duchess of Sussex but would have to become miss and potentially senator Markle. Members of reigning constitutional European monarchies don't become active elected politicians. It might be the right moment for the UK government to pass a law taking away the titles of Harry and possibly Andrew. It would also be smart to exclude both men from the line of succession and they might opt to exclude Harry's offspring.
Yeah, no. If by authenticity you mean totally wrong.
Duchess Senator for California
has a certain ring of authenticity.
Hmm, no, not really. Did she pay you to say that here?
271
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index