Stadium decision deferred... |
Re: Stadium decision deferred...
Posted by stillager
|
Re: Stadium decision deferred...
Posted by Talisman Mark Stott is the owner of course.. he could have thought of an app One is silver the other is gold
|
Re: Stadium decision deferred...
Posted by Mustafapoint
|
Re: Stadium decision deferred...
Posted by dosser jacket
|
Re: Stadium decision deferred...
Posted by Fuzzbox
|
Re: Stadium decision deferred...
Posted by Nik
|
Re: Stadium decision deferred...
Posted by Pedro
|
Re: Stadium decision deferred...
Posted by Rustybar There was an error in the report which could leave them open to judicial review if they took a decision either way. But that wasn't said in the meeting.What was said was they had received a late submission and it was important committee had all the info presented properly hence deferment without discussion.
|
Re: Stadium decision deferred...
Posted by Pedro
|
Re: Stadium decision deferred...
Posted by dosser jacket
|
Re: Stadium decision deferred...
Posted by PhilRobbie
|
Re: Stadium decision deferred...
Posted by PhilRobbie
|
Re: (no subject)
Posted by 90's Hatter
|
Admin
Posted by 90's Hatter Ta.
|
Re: (no subject)
Posted by Mustafapoint
|
Re: (no subject)
Posted by Rustybar
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |