Re: (no subject)
Posted by Mustafapoint
on July 3, 2025, 22:30:57, in reply to "
Re: (no subject)"
I was just about to say that it's been a waste land for decades, and that they should get on with it and approve it, as it's a straightforward decision. But you put it more succinctly 
|
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
- Stadium decision deferred... - albertinspain July 3, 2025, 18:38:23
- Re: Stadium decision deferred... - stillager July 3, 2025, 19:08:30
- Re: Stadium decision deferred... - Talisman July 4, 2025, 9:00:47
- Re: Stadium decision deferred... - Nik July 3, 2025, 21:11:11
- Re: Stadium decision deferred... - Pedro July 3, 2025, 19:12:11
- Re: Stadium decision deferred... - Rustybar July 3, 2025, 19:49:48
- Re: Stadium decision deferred... - Pedro July 3, 2025, 20:07:35
- Re: Stadium decision deferred... - dosser jacket July 3, 2025, 20:55:08
- Re: Stadium decision deferred... - PhilRobbie July 3, 2025, 21:50:33
- Re: Stadium decision deferred... - PhilRobbie July 3, 2025, 21:50:28
- Re: (no subject) - 90's Hatter July 3, 2025, 22:11:39
- Admin - 90's Hatter July 3, 2025, 22:10:52
- Re: (no subject) - Mustafapoint July 3, 2025, 22:30:57
« Back to index | View thread » |
