90% of the 15 items focused on were not achieved at a 1st division level in that judges opinion. I would think that at least earning "consistently" for 13/15 would make a 1.

I think my point is that while the rubric seems to also be up to interpretation.

Do you believe that earning only 60% of "Consistently" is deserving of a 1st division?

Definitely a conversation to be had many times to try and refine how the rubric is used.