Posted by John W on 28/7/2022, 2:55:00, in reply to "That is not what was said at all."User logged in as John W It might not have been what you meant, but it is what you said: "I’d say they are the most recent common ancestors of all European royalty, save for Montenegro which has no known or recorded genealogical connections to any of the others now." Message Thread parental "in-law" of European royals - Forrest 21/7/2022, 19:02:14 D. João VI King of Portugal - José 21/7/2022, 21:37:15 Re: parental "in-law" of European royals - Erik 22/7/2022, 20:59:13 Re: parental "in-law" of European royals - Eleonore 22/7/2022, 21:23:50 Re: parental "in-law" of European royals - Erik 22/7/2022, 21:53:42 Re: parental "in-law" of European royals - Eleonore 25/7/2022, 18:29:03 Re: parental "in-law" of European royals - John W 23/7/2022, 1:52:10 Re: parental "in-law" of European royals - Erik 23/7/2022, 10:19:15 Re: parental "in-law" of European royals - John W 23/7/2022, 14:00:38 Re: parental "in-law" of European royals - erik 23/7/2022, 14:07:43 Frederick I, Margrave of Brandenburg-Ansbach and Sophia Jagiellon, Princess of Poland - Charles 25/7/2022, 17:25:54 Montenegro RF - Forrest 26/7/2022, 14:22:42 That is not what was said at all. - Charles 27/7/2022, 15:14:41 Yes, it is - John W 28/7/2022, 2:55:00 Re: Yes, it is - Charles 28/7/2022, 6:28:00 « Back to index
Post a response WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.Your Name: Subject: Message: clear Please Log in. Optional Image URL: Optional Link Title:Optional Link URL: Notify me by email of all message replies. By posting, you confirm that you have read and agree to the board's usage terms.
WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.
Subject:
Notify me by email of all message replies.