At some point, it was cited that the Royal Family would comprehend all those invited to the Queen's Christmas lunch.
I would remind that at such gathering were present Pss. Margaret children and grand-children, Pss Anne's husband and children, the children of the Dukes of Gloucester and Kent, Pr.Michael's family and Pss Alexandra's children.
They may be the Queen's family but NOT members of the RF, understood as working royals.
Same as the descendants of Pss Mary.
The Bowes-Lyon were called to the discussion. Where would it stop ? Are we going to call Q.Mary's family, the Tecks-Abel-Smiths ?
And, in the future, King Charles III cousins via his greek aunts ?
I am genuinely at a loss to know why you place such reliance on Burkes - it's a private company.
Awaiting your citation of one authoriatative source produced with the assistance of the Queen's own staff -as Burkes GRF was in 1972. Even one citation will do. So far, you've offered only your own hot air
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index