Posted by John W on 28/8/2020, 6:33, in reply to "Re: Jacobitism and Carlism"User logged in as John W
Indeed so, Johan. But the Jacobites are the more absurd. They make claims on behalf of people who do not, themselves, make such claims. They refer to 'Elizabeth Windsor' and 'Charles Windsor', notwithstanding the impossibility of such styles, then claim that that is no different from 'Henry Tudor', all while pomping on about 'King Francis II'.
('Henry Tudor' is usually used for the period prior to his usurpation. HenryVII is almost used for the period after.)
