Wait, is it not you who has been channeling Cassandra here regarding the danger to royals of false representations of them being consumed as fact? Well for some of us, distortion is distortion, no matter who is disseminating false narratives, Shakespeare included. You choose to narrowly react to The Crown, where I see all such dramas as blurring history, going back centuries; in other words, nothing new here.
As for that drama-queen “Crown war“ subject subject line, good to remember that Ukraine is what a war looks like, not some media-driven tempest-in-a-teacup over a Netflix production that few will even remember three years on.
1. No, that was you alone who conflated Shakespeare with hack writers of recent royal film/tv shows.
2. No, I'm linking news of actual public figures speaking out publicly on the distortions or outright lies of "The Crown". And I will continue to so do.
3. What you excuse as "false narrative" may in fact arise to much more in the legal dimension in this example of "The Crown" and its narratives and those who have publicly agreed with them. Time will tell on that.
4. It's not "about" Ukraine, not that people like you really "care" except to use Ukraine here, but you're always free to join a Ukraine war forum if you're so inclined. As Karen already told you clearly, it's about royalty and not the hatred of it that consumes people like you.
5. Post further at me with any retort, and I won't waste further time with you. You'll just get this exact response in cut-and-paste which is still more than you even deserve.
319