Stig or others will have to tell if there are statutes for titles like Kammerherre etc. The statutes for the Dannebrog Order is here: http://www.omsd.dk/DanishOrders/docs/Dannebrogordenens%20Statutter%201693.pdf Relevant section is no. 5 (I think). If you are "dømt fra Ære, Lif eller Gods" ("sentenced from Honour, Life or Property"
Section no. 5 is indeed relevant here, but not only the phrase you quoted ("dømt fra Ære, Lif eller Gods") but also "den, som er berygtet for nogen skammelig Gierning" ("he who is disreputable for any disgraceful act").
King Frederik VI's open letter of 28 June 1808 makes some additions to the statutes for the Danneborg Order, and here we find another relevant paragraph:
"Naar nogen Dannebrogsmand eller Ridder skulde ved Domstolene vorde tiltalt eller saggivet for saadan Handling, som kunde medføre legemlig Straf, eller Ærens og den offentlige Agtelses Fortabelse, skal det være Domstolenes Pligt ufortøvet herom at giøre Indberetning til Vort Cancellie, paa det Samme kan foranledige Ordens-Kapitulets Forestilling til Vor allerhøieste Resolution, om den Tiltalte eller Saggivne indtil videre skal forbydes at bære sit Ordenstegn."
It means, more or less, that the monarch must be notified when a Knight of the Order of the Dannebrog is put on trial, so that the monarch can decide if the person can no-longer wear his decoration.
KongeligtaabentBrev
I don't know if there are any specific statutes for the title Kammerherre (Chamberlain), but he must sign a declaration with the wording: "Så lover jeg herved på ære og samvittighed at være Hendes Majestæt tro og lydig, at holde rigets grundlov og samvittighedsfuldt opfylde de pligter, som nævnte charge pålægger mig" - which is a promise to obey the Queen and the Constitution.
If the Queen finds Christian Kjær unworthy of being a Knight of the Order of the Dannebrog, then it would be odd if she still finds him worthy of being a Kammerherre.
1