Every football club goes on poor runs. There’s nothing to suggest Mark Stott takes such a short term view of 5 poor results.
We’d have gone through four managers a season most of the last twenty years if all it took was a run of 5-10 poor results.
Jim Gannon is the ONLY manager to consistently improve us since the late nineties, and if you exclude Alan Lord the only manager to improve us at all since 1998. That gives him a lot wiggle room to go on occasional poor runs of results. You might not like it but anyone with a long term goal in mind can look at his record at this football club and see that he has it moving in the right direction.
I get the impression you wanted him out when we were struggling at the start of last season, and probably when we had a poor start in 2007. You probably thought sacking him after Mansfield was a good idea too. How did all those things work out in the end?