"What's your damage, dude?"
Ouch!!!
Unsurprisingly also, it's you alone who insist on second-guessing the late Queen and present King's decisions to involve the longtime footman in that process. But maybe not so surprising at all, given you the self-appointed "source" also presumes to know better than the royal family website as a source, or American law as the ultimate source of what are legal designations on government issued documents. Yes, you're not "alone" in your dubious opinion about the Queen's archives, given that a back-up for any opinion can be sourced nowadays. In this case, one that has about as much validity as yours.
Unsurprisingly, perhaps, we here are not the only people exercised by The King's appointing a Page of the late Queen's to undertake the initial assessment of her papers:
https://thecritic.co.uk/open-the-royal-files/
393
Message Thread
« Back to index