Re: The queen's archive, revisited
Unsurprisingly also, it's you alone who insist on second-guessing the late Queen and present King's decisions to involve the longtime footman in that process. But maybe not so surprising at all, given you the self-appointed "source" also presumes to know better than the royal family website as a source, or American law as the ultimate source of what are legal designations on government issued documents. Yes, you're not "alone" in your dubious opinion about the Queen's archives, given that a back-up for any opinion can be sourced nowadays. In this case, one that has about as much validity as yours. Previous Message
|