Is there anything in this particular article which states that the primary responsbility of sorting through Her late Majesty's is Mr. Whybrew's?
"Yes."
Indeed; that is on the writer of the article and the editor of this particular news site though. The absence of other information or further clarity is a sign that we oughtn't go directly to one firm conclusion or another.
"On the contrary, we have to deal with the information we have because, otherwise, we would never be able to discuss anything. We cannot know that which we have not been told and we cannot know if there is more to know."
As I have said before, all that can be drawn from the article is that Mr. Whybrew is part of a larger process. The writer and editor decided it was newsworthy and worth noting, they do not give us any insight as to Mr. Whybrew's particular place among this team nor the rest of its composition. We oughtn't jump to conclusions in the absence of many facts and details.
"On the contrary, we have been told that he has been tasked with conducting an initial sift."
"Until the fire at Windsor", alright, and since then?
"Since then The Queen volunteered to pay an amount into Consolidated Review that she considered to have been the equivalent of what she would have paid had she been liable to taxation, thus carefully preserving her claim to be beyond the purview of taxation law."
https://thecritic.co.uk/issues/july-2023/royals-on-the-witness-stand/
That the monarch is still not seen as existing in q private capacity is surely demonstrated by the fact that the late Queen, even when travelling privately, never used a passport. Even Her decision to pay the equivalent of tax following the Windsor fire, was voluntary and did not actually establish her obligation, as a person with PRIVATE resources, to do so.
Consequently, all of her papers should be considered, if not public, at least susceptible to archiving.
Yet Her late Majesty is said to have owned Sandringham, etc, in a private capacity, etc, etc, etc.
"Yes she did. As did her predecessors. And they all succeeded in persuading successive Governments to overlook the absurdity of their asserting both their capacity to own property in a private capacity and their immunity from the obligations of private property ownership and and the generation of private income."
I am sure all of Her late Majesty's papers will be susceptible to archiving: I have no doubt that things which will be kept private will also be subject to a distinct and separately considered archival, preservation, inventorial, and storage process.
"I'm reassured by your certainty, but that is the point at issue. And if you were correct, the Page would not be sifting through the papers."
I imagine also that certain things will be available for historians and the public to examine at various future points in consideration of those who have living memory of particular events, etc.
"Of that I am certain."
218