Yes, there is that contractual motive at play, but I would also speculate about the wider fallout going forward - and Jacinda Ardern may only be the beginning of that. Given her role and political prominence, it's not surprising that she is first among those in the original documentary to issue a disclaimer. But by the same token, other personalities present in the original documentary who are/were prominent in their field might well also wish to distanciate themselves from the Two Appropriators - for instance, the feminist activist Gloria Steinem, the climate campaigner Greta Thunberg and the American basketball player Stephen Curry. Each of whom might well ponder whether they would want to be drawn into a potentially litigious situation that this ongoing Netflix series could well generate, either in the UK or U.S. courts. My point being, we may well see any of those parties acting by way of some disclaimer to also ensure they are not dragged into a legal dispute by way of "perceived association" with the Sussex agenda. What think you?