And it was good that the tourist guide educated him on history -- specifically, to point out the factual errors in Friedrich Schiller's play, the basis of Giuseppe Verdi's opera. It seems that the only true fact is that Isabelle de Valois was indeed originally betrothed to the king's son.
However, it's not true that there was a romantic Phaedra-type relationship between Carlos and his stepmother. And she actually was happy in her marriage to his father. Although many years her senior, he was not (say) three times her age or old enough to be her grandfather. The aria "Ella giammai m'amo", where Felipe II mentions his bride wincing after seeing his white hair, is simply inaccurate: he was at the time only 32 -- an age when most men don't have white hairs.
And the Marquis de Posa is a fictional character, while that of Princess Eboli is blown out of proportion. Are you familiar with the play or the opera? What other historical errors can you point out? Previous Message
It is not an object, but a place, from where Felipe II observed the works of El Escorial.
Some info in English
https://www.sanlorenzoturismo.es/en/rutas-en-la-naturaleza/seat-of-felipe-ii/ Previous Message
I'm a little puzzled about this: is it actually an object kept outdoors? I ask because of the photograph in another article about Jonas Kaufmann and company touring the monastery and burial sites. Here's the link to it --
https://www.beckmesser.com/kaufmann-frente-al-verdadero-don-carlos/?fbclid=IwAR17Zveg-FMcMmiBCfVymVRHks9rD5Ch5fmASojwPCLNvDn-dKKMTZ6SKn8
418
Message Thread
« Back to index