Anyway, I do not understand the double standards in this case. How can one accept equality between men and women when they become monarchs, but not when they become consorts? I will never understand it. In countries like Spain, we have always had Kings, Dukes, Counts, etc, consort and there has never been a problem. Why are those countries which have never/seldom allowed female succession so reluctant to accept this concept?
It isn’t so gender neutral/equal after all… Daniel should be titled crown prince (consort) and eventually become king consort of Sweden… or all future female consorts should not be crown princess or queen.
Okay, that is your opinion. I don't agree. I don't think that any of the current monarchies allow a male consort to use the title of the male Monarch. When UK introduced gender neutral succession, Prine Philip was not made King. And Prince Henrik of Denmark wasn't King.
595
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index