Barnet managed to get their match cancelled last bight through Covid/injuries etc, just hoe they can get enough players for next saturday.
Re: Barnet
Posted by Nik on 22/1/2022, 9:05 am, in reply to "Barnet"
I'd imagine a sufficient number of players that were unavailable due to injury/COVID will have recovered/tested negative.
There's 8 days between fixtures; people recover as time passes.
Re: Barnet
Posted by Talisman on 22/1/2022, 9:26 am, in reply to "Re: Barnet"
That’s all well and good if Barnet are trustworthy in the first place …
There’s no procedure in place to check/verify by the authorities when clubs ask for postponement …“ Not everything that is faced can be changed - but nothing can be changed until it is faced “
Re: Barnet
Posted by Nik on 22/1/2022, 10:54 am, in reply to "Re: Barnet"
As I've said to others on here though, there's no reason to suggest they or any other club aren't unless there's some hard evidence to support it.
Re: Barnet
Posted by Talisman on 22/1/2022, 11:20 am, in reply to "Re: Barnet"
Rules and regulations (OR NO rules and regs appertaining to the subject matter) mean clubs can drive a coach and horses through the request to postpone games without the need to give proof and facts of the matter at hand ...
That is NOT the way to conduct a professional authoritative organised body ..!
“ Not everything that is faced can be changed - but nothing can be changed until it is faced “
Re: Barnet
Posted by Matty ov Rio on 23/1/2022, 9:55 am, in reply to "Re: Barnet"
I don’t understand your point. What has the National League got to do with a professional, organised, authoritative body?
0 out of 3 for them I’d say.Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. Mark Twain
Re: Barnet
Posted by Talisman on 22/1/2022, 8:09 am, in reply to "Barnet"
Very suspicious IMO 🌚“ Not everything that is faced can be changed - but nothing can be changed until it is faced “