Re: Veganism in football...
Posted by Mozzer on 21/10/2019, 1:24 pm, in reply to "Re: Veganism in football..."
Reasons for refusal, back in June: |
The proposed development is contrary to Policies CP15 and EI11 of the adopted Stroud District Local Plan,
November 2015 and EP1 of the adopted Eastington Neighbourhood Development Plan 2016 being located in a
rural location outside the defined development limits. The proposal would be very prominent from localised
viewpoints and would appear out of character with the Severn Vale. There is insufficient information on the design
and landscaping to ensure that the character of the landscape can be maintained. There is similar intervisibility with
adjacent listed buildings along Grove Lane, and the proposal would impair their rural setting and character, contrary
to Local Plan Policies EI11, CP14 (5 & 8) ES7, ES10 and NDP Policy EP4. The scheme would also appear
overbearing and cause general disturbance that would harm the amenities of the neighbouring residents along
Grove Lane contrary to Local Plan Policies CP14 (7) ES3 (1). It has also not been demonstrated that the vitality and
viability of Nailsworth Town would not be adversely affected by the loss of the existing stadium contrary to Local
Plan Policy CP12. It has therefore not been demonstrated that the scheme provides sufficient sustainable benefits
to outweigh the harm to the character, appearance and amenities of the area to justify a departure from the adopted
development plan in accordance with paragraph 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (Feb 2019).
New application submitted here.
It's so easy to laugh; it's so easy to hate
It takes guts to be gentle and kind.