Re: Back four Archived Message Posted by Pedro on February 18, 2024, 13:00:23, in reply to "Re: Back four" Camps recently has been preferred and Croasdale has been subbed at half time the last two games due to performance. My point is we needed another defensive mid and we didn't get one. My second point is Croasdale is not good enough as a footballer. He is the only player we have of his type and therefore looks better than what he is as no one else breaks up the play like he does. But his play after that is not good enough. He does not keep the ball well enough and gives it a way. Every player yesterday was to blame for the result but to just look at the defence is not fixing problem in other areas. When an unfit Collar came on in the second half we looked better going forwards than we did when a fully fit Croasdale was on the pitch. Message Thread: Back four - stillager February 18, 2024, 10:05:39 Re: Back four - Pedro February 18, 2024, 10:53:28 Re: Back four - mcduff February 18, 2024, 15:54:25 Re: Back four - dosser jacket February 18, 2024, 20:34:51 Re: Back four - Nik February 18, 2024, 11:04:52 Re: Back four - Pedro February 18, 2024, 11:11:37 Re: Back four - Nik February 18, 2024, 11:43:24 Re: Back four - Pedro February 18, 2024, 13:00:23 Re: Back four - Nik February 18, 2024, 13:38:28 Re: Back four - Pedro February 18, 2024, 13:46:14 Re: Back four - Nik February 18, 2024, 14:00:21 Re: Back four - Nik February 18, 2024, 10:12:54 Re: Back four - mreckless February 18, 2024, 11:27:01 Re: Back four - DownUnderHatter February 18, 2024, 14:26:42 Re: Back four - dosser jacket February 18, 2024, 15:47:56 Re: Back four - 42wworral February 18, 2024, 11:05:33   Searching