My two points of argument ahead of the adjudication:
- The admission failed to mention its status as an official Marsden and instead referred to it as a 'double post', which is an unaccepted term and risks punishment via the board Terms and Conditions.
- Said admission was not made on the offending post, but rather the non-Marsden post. This, I believe, was a purposeful and cynical action to avoid the ramifications of being Marsdened.
I therefore declare my calling of a Marsden to be done in compliance with all Committee rules and policy.