- Re: PPG Archived Message
- PPG - Bungle 10/4/2021, 8:46 pm
- Re: PPG - TLOBS 10/4/2021, 9:47 pm
- Re: PPG - dosser jacket 10/4/2021, 10:19 pm
- Re: PPG - dosser jacket 10/4/2021, 10:19 pm
- Re: PPG - Saint Saviour 10/4/2021, 9:37 pm
- Re: PPG - Bungle 10/4/2021, 10:45 pm
- Re: PPG - rreckless 10/4/2021, 10:11 pm
- Re: PPG - Sjp1980 10/4/2021, 11:50 pm
- Re: PPG - Sjp1980 10/4/2021, 11:50 pm
- Re: PPG - TheRealExile 10/4/2021, 9:05 pm
- Re: PPG - TLOBS 10/4/2021, 9:47 pm
Posted by Saint Saviour
on 11/4/2021, 12:35 am, in reply to "Re: PPG"
|
Pretty diss that on the past achievements Sjp. If you only have 225k playing budget including managers costs I would say AL did well and did it very PROFESSIONALY. To come through the organic growth under JG to eventually rise higher yr on yr with the budgets he had was an achievement and always done very PROFESSIONALY. So now under MS with stratospheric budgets (by comparison) and the mammoth management infrastructure its very different and of course very PROFESSIONAL so we should walk this league next season (if we fail tho get up and out this) If we failed this season under JG at the end of season he would have been removed "for results". If we finish below 4th this season IMO Rusk will have performed poorly. If we fail to get promoted via play offs (if we get in them) Rusk will have performed poorly. Should the latter happen - should Rusk be in place nest season? I ain't so sure given his start position and ability to stregthen with whom ever he or wilson wanted. All simply opinion, many will differ, and suggest Rusk be given next season... I doubt that could be argued against to be fair to him.. If we aren't knocking the lights out first 15 games next season though, he will have to be changed and merry go round can begin.
|
Message Thread: | This response ↓
|