And yet I didn't describe the 0.21 that Gannon has over Rusk in away form as 'way better'.
The way you worded it adds a perception to it; the way I worded it was straight facts.
And yes, that 0.18 PPG could be fairly significant across a season, however when you're 0.21 PPG worse off in aways, it isn't going to be.
My point was that when comparing Gannon and Rusk's results this season, there is very, very little in it. Gannon is better away, Rusk is better at home. Overall they've got the same number of points (27) with Rusk having played a game extra.