Re: Co-op shares funds Archived Message Posted by scarf on 17/1/2020, 8:52 am, in reply to "Co-op shares funds" Apologies in advance if this has already been explained, but did the O-op ask to keep the shares? The only thing I’m disappointed with about yesterday is that the Co-op are no longer shareholders (for accountability/scrutiny purposes). If the Co-op did ask to keep the shares, why did Stott say no? I know there are rules about takeovers buying out small shareholders compulsorily (which I’m not au fair with) so perhaps the Co-op keeping the shares wasn’t an option, but I’d like to hear a bit more about MS’s attitude towards the Co-op in their conversation, if possible? Message Thread: Co-op shares funds - mattyovrio 17/1/2020, 6:54 am Re: Co-op shares funds - scarf 17/1/2020, 8:52 am Another question - Jack 17/1/2020, 9:40 am Re: Another question - Red Hatter 17/1/2020, 10:04 am Re: Another question - timberwolf 17/1/2020, 10:15 am Re: Co-op shares funds - Imposter 17/1/2020, 9:09 am Re: Co-op shares funds - suedehead 17/1/2020, 9:18 am Re: Co-op shares funds - suedehead 17/1/2020, 9:19 am Re: Co-op shares funds - suedehead 17/1/2020, 8:06 am Re: Co-op shares funds - Imposter 17/1/2020, 9:18 am Re: Co-op shares funds - Imposter 17/1/2020, 10:03 am   Searching