This is the post that started it all, clear to anybody that there is a second result in there.
You answered
That's reliant on other results though.
Now that answer basically says that other results need to go our way other than the one already stated as you say that his statement works reliant on other results, which of course it isnt as the statement shows the only other result needed, at that point you maybe should have realised how your statement sounded, maybe it was the way you worded it as you are now counting it as another result when that was covered in his original statement
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index | View thread »