Do you not see my point that it's odd to credit Rusk when something has improved but blame the players for something that's not going so well?
If I claimed that the defensive improvements had nothing to do with Rusk and was all down to the players, you'd think I was being ridiculous. It's equally ridiculous to say the lack of goals is entirely down to the players and nothing to do with the way they're being asked to play.
If we're judging/praising Rusk, we should at least be consistent in the logic behind it.
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index | View thread »