Re: The case for the defence, m'lud
|
My 'obsession' pales in comparison to your obvious and quite clear obsession with slagging him off at every turn, when he was here and after he's gone.
He must have done something pretty major to upset you.
|
 |
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
- The case for the defence, m'lud - Mustafapoint 25/2/2021, 8:01 pm
- Re: The case for the defence, m'lud - Sjp1980 26/2/2021, 6:34 pm
- Re: The case for the defence, m'lud - DownUnderHatter 26/2/2021, 12:32 pm
- Re: The case for the defence, m'lud - Sparta FC 26/2/2021, 11:54 am
- The case for the prosecution - Ken Riley 26/2/2021, 11:54 am
- Re: The case for the defence, m'lud - Jack 26/2/2021, 9:10 am
- Re: The case for the defence, m'lud - Bungle 27/2/2021, 8:06 pm
- Re: The case for the defence, m'lud - Bungle 26/2/2021, 9:17 pm
- Re: The case for the defence, m'lud - Sparta FC 26/2/2021, 11:56 am
- Re: The case for the defence, m'lud - Halfbreed 26/2/2021, 11:52 am
- Re: The case for the defence, m'lud - Mustafapoint 26/2/2021, 10:19 am
- Re: The case for the Prosecution More Like, m'lud - Saint Saviour 26/2/2021, 12:11 am
- Re: The case for the defence, m'lud - Mustafapoint 25/2/2021, 9:12 pm
- Re: The case for the defence, m'lud - Ken Riley 25/2/2021, 8:46 pm
- Re: The case for the defence, m'lud - Mustafapoint 25/2/2021, 8:02 pm
« Back to index | View thread » |
on 27/2/2021, 12:54 pm, in reply to "