The straw man is that you then started saying that it was reprehensible that she didn't know about Churchill when that was never your argument to begin with. That argument is also flawed though as she at no time says she knows nothing about him.
Every criticism you're firing at her is based on your own assumptions.
You also say this story has 'spread worldwide', it appears to have been reported, almost a month ago, on a grand total of 2 news website.
One news site, news.com.au is owned by Rupert Murdoch. The other is TheBlaze.com which is a conversative American website. Unsurprising that these two sources would spin a story in that manner, given their interests.
It's an absolute non-story.
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index | View thread »