Thanks. That clears it up. I thought it might be something like that.

I forgot to mention that in the 43:11 minute YouTube posting there were a lot of Beatles numbers that reached #1.

I didn't think they were that good when I was young in High School, and I still don't.

They did have some good songs, in my view, and were obviously more popular than I thought they would be.

As discussed in previous posts, quality is not synonymous with popularity and success.

Getting back to Jim Reeves, his songs are works of art, again in my humble opinion.