What was described in the article was nothing less than infanticide if the infant could survive outside it's mother. Why not just pull it out and put it up for adoption? I personally don't believe there will be many women who choose these late abortions except to save their own lives or if the child is so deformed or defective it cannot live outside the uterus. Maybe it's backlash against the busy-body bible thumpers who want to ban abortion altogether or after a heartbeat starts.
Note almost all the states that want to ban abortion have the largest number of poorly educated people, poor people, the most incest and porn searches on Google, are the most (hypocrites) religious.
If all these anti-choice people really care about children so much they would be screaming for justice for the brown children in those tent camps where 6 have already died. They would be adopting the thousands of unwanted kids in foster care. They would be offering to pay for the higher education of poor children. They should put their money where their mouth is as my father would say.
« Back to index