the mythical team that you claim you could build with guys who are no points are the ones that should be assigned points or rated as such so that you can't have a no point AA team. by your own argument you are saying there are guys who are under rated/valued.
this has been your crutch to the points argument for a long time.
for the A teams that were under points, the sponsors building the team are telling you that you didn't do a good job rating the players if you think the team should be rated higher.
you is directed a the classification committee.
the whole rating system needs be overhauled.
major=open no arguments
AA=X amount of major guys combined with Y amount of watch players
A=X amount of watch list players and Y amount of AA players
if you still end up with teams who value wise should be different you need to reevaluate how you are rating players.