But my thing is this, why does being the best B team in the middle of the year in someone's opinion mean they should be an A team? At the end of the day, someone has to be the top team in B. Whether or not they could compete in a higher class shouldn't have any bearing on what class they're allowed to play in as long as they're legal. They're playing against the teams in higher classes at conference events as it is anyway.
They have 0 roster points and no chips.
If the A/AA teams don't want to lose to a B team, they should get better. *shrug*
This whole bump argument just seems goofy to me.