To valid...what exactly is the issue with major teams being seeded lower? They obviously have the talent, not to mention a bigger bench. It gets old seeing a major team beat up on B and C teams in the first round. Classic has spent the money to play 2 more tournies than monsta, but you feel monsta should be higher because of the quality of tournaments they play? Again, no one is stopping major teams from traveling to the west coast to get these supposedly easy points. Do you think it's fair that west coast teams have to spend more money to keep traveling east? No one wants to spend money unnecessarily if they don't have to. What if next year, the first 4 tournies are on the west coast? Would the east coast teams fly across the country or will they sit at home and fall behind in points quickly? In my opinion, they'd be forced to fly out west for fear of falling behind and having to pay catch up on points. I think all conference events should have the point system be the same. At the beginning of the year, teams set their schedules. Say classic signs up to play in a tournament where 4 major teams are scheduled to be at. Injuries happen along with other issues, forcing 2 major teams to pull out. Are you going to drop your amount of points?