Events where there are zero major teams, will by definition skew the numbers you are looking at.

I'm making a major assumption based on following this stuff for years, but those events tend to have far more B-D teams in them then events where there are 2-3 major teams (big point events).

So if you use events where there were no major teams present in #s where you are comparing the major teams # of games vs the number another class (a or aa) plays, its less accurate.

I'm not refuting your position, I'm just asking what the records look like if you take those events out. Those events are outliers and far less reflective of the average conference event.