Re: Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs

Posted by OldBandDude on 11/22/2019, 1:23 pm, in reply to "Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs"

Re: Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs

Posted by Me on 11/22/2019, 10:01 am, in reply to "Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs"

A prime example of why teachers aren't taken seriously in society. Previous Message Okay...before you chastise me for having this absolutely silly argument, it's post-football season and we were at lunch. With that said, settle this agreement between me and my co-worker: The calling of dibs. The silly disagreement has continued and we're not agreeing - yet. Here's the scenario. One of us went to a chicken restaurant today. The patron received one extra tender included in their box. Upon returning to the band hall the discovery of extra tender was made, and one of the two of us called "DIBS." One argued that since the patron did not purchase the 5th tender that it is then up for grabs under the 'dibs' system. The other argued that since it was included in the meal it's not up for dibs. So...who is right? And post your reasoning if you'd like please!

Re: Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs

Posted by football player on 11/21/2019, 12:01 pm, in reply to "Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs"

a band kid would have counted it correctly, but then that's why they were the manager, and not the tender boxer Previous Message Okay...before you chastise me for having this absolutely silly argument, it's post-football season and we were at lunch. With that said, settle this agreement between me and my co-worker: The calling of dibs. The silly disagreement has continued and we're not agreeing - yet. Here's the scenario. One of us went to a chicken restaurant today. The patron received one extra tender included in their box. Upon returning to the band hall the discovery of extra tender was made, and one of the two of us called "DIBS." One argued that since the patron did not purchase the 5th tender that it is then up for grabs under the 'dibs' system. The other argued that since it was included in the meal it's not up for dibs. So...who is right? And post your reasoning if you'd like please!

Re: Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs

Posted by LRIII on 11/21/2019, 8:18 am, in reply to "Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs"

THIS is the yellowboard content I've been yearning for. Should have called 'shotgun' instead. Then it's no question. Previous Message Okay...before you chastise me for having this absolutely silly argument, it's post-football season and we were at lunch. With that said, settle this agreement between me and my co-worker: The calling of dibs. The silly disagreement has continued and we're not agreeing - yet. Here's the scenario. One of us went to a chicken restaurant today. The patron received one extra tender included in their box. Upon returning to the band hall the discovery of extra tender was made, and one of the two of us called "DIBS." One argued that since the patron did not purchase the 5th tender that it is then up for grabs under the 'dibs' system. The other argued that since it was included in the meal it's not up for dibs. So...who is right? And post your reasoning if you'd like please!

Re: Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs

Posted by But... on 11/21/2019, 8:10 am, in reply to "Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs"

Re: Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs

Posted by El Jefe on 11/21/2019, 7:20 am, in reply to "Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs"

Re: Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs

Posted by Solution on 11/20/2019, 10:08 pm, in reply to "Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs"

Re: Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs

Posted by Me on 11/20/2019, 4:23 pm, in reply to "Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs"

Re: Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs

Posted by Just Luck on 11/20/2019, 4:16 pm, in reply to "Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs"

No dibs- its their lunch.... Previous Message Okay...before you chastise me for having this absolutely silly argument, it's post-football season and we were at lunch. With that said, settle this agreement between me and my co-worker: The calling of dibs. The silly disagreement has continued and we're not agreeing - yet. Here's the scenario. One of us went to a chicken restaurant today. The patron received one extra tender included in their box. Upon returning to the band hall the discovery of extra tender was made, and one of the two of us called "DIBS." One argued that since the patron did not purchase the 5th tender that it is then up for grabs under the 'dibs' system. The other argued that since it was included in the meal it's not up for dibs. So...who is right? And post your reasoning if you'd like please!

Re: Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs

Posted by Solomon... on 11/20/2019, 4:12 pm, in reply to "Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs"

Re: Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs

Posted by Thank you on 11/20/2019, 3:57 pm, in reply to "Settle a silly band hall argument - calling of dibs"

Thank you for making me laugh. Best post in about a decade....maybe more! Previous Message Okay...before you chastise me for having this absolutely silly argument, it's post-football season and we were at lunch. With that said, settle this agreement between me and my co-worker: The calling of dibs. The silly disagreement has continued and we're not agreeing - yet. Here's the scenario. One of us went to a chicken restaurant today. The patron received one extra tender included in their box. Upon returning to the band hall the discovery of extra tender was made, and one of the two of us called "DIBS." One argued that since the patron did not purchase the 5th tender that it is then up for grabs under the 'dibs' system. The other argued that since it was included in the meal it's not up for dibs. So...who is right? And post your reasoning if you'd like please!