So if I'm locally paying for schools that are fine then I'm probably not looking to go elsewhere for my child's education and not complaining about my tax bill. If I am in a location where the school is a mess and I'm paying for said mess but want a better option for my child doesn't it seem fair that I don't have to pay for the mess I don't want my child in and can use my taxes for a situation that will better serve them INSTEAD of having to pay for the mess I don't want to send my kid to AND the place I do? Seems to me if it's a local issue then let the local money go where it wants. For those that don't have kids in school it's a non-issue because I can't walk my tax dollars unless my child goes somewhere else. So I am paying taxes for the next 50 years to a school my child won't attend..... But you think that moving my taxes for 12 years is a deal breaker? Come on with the Kool-Aid