Well yes, IF the UK had a law which said only one Christian name was legally allowed. Any names over and above those legally allowed would be "illegal' or "unofficial".
I wonder have I stumbled upon a cultural difference here? The law is the law, isn't it? Previous Message
CHARLES III Philip Arthur George.
Would you say that Philip Arthur George are "unofficial" names ? Previous Message
Thanks, you are right.
In his ID the King is Felipe Juan. It could be heard when he voted on the referendum for the European constitution. Previous Message
Those aren’t good terms to use in this instance; perhaps ‘civil’ and ‘baptismal’…
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index