Apparently some records have shown that Richard, Duke of York was absent fighting the French when Edward was conceived and these have fuelled the rumours about his paternity which even reached the ears of the French king whose ambassador to the English court, Philippe de Commines, later wrote about them in his memoirs. What's certainly true is that the Duke of York, who ought to know, fully acknowledged Edward as his heir and there was no dispute over Edward inheriting the dukedom of York and his father's claim to the English throne.
I have discussed some other examples in my reply to William. There have been no questions ever raised about James VI/I's paternity as far as I'm aware. His mother had married Darnley, with whom she had fallen madly in love, only a year before James was born so there seems no reason why anybody else would have come on the scene during that time. I think it is as safe as anyone can possibly say that James was Darnley's true offspring (unless a DNA test could prove otherwise).
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index