Posted by Mark Baldassarre on 11/25/2005, 9:07 pm, in reply to "Re: That's funny?"
64.111.149.239

JSF None of what is stated there precludes the "Presa" from being used to reconstruct the Neo. The "document" is so pecuniary in it's language...it says basically nothing. Example #1: "It is agreed on Sunday 22 in a public announcement that "all neighbors, inhabitants and residents kill all their dogs, except one, which they are allowed to keep to guard their homes, but if it is a Presa dog or a cattle dog it must be tied up." Except one...each! example #2: "the Presa disappears, only traces of it remaining" Did it disappear or were there traces remaining? Now, this is not to say that the Presa at the time was THE ORIGINAL Presa. I'd have no way of knowing that. Neither would your author! He admits that in his writting. It's funny what people will consider to be fact, when it is really speculation. Just because someone compiles a bunch of speculation,it doesn't make it fact. Butch is impressed by "substantiated" speculation. I see it for what it is. Mark