Posted by Caulkhead in exile
![]()
on 13/5/2003, 10:35 pm, in reply to "Re: so its Eastleigh and Burguss Hill and No Maidstone"
195.93.34.7
I did hear that Eastleigh's financial backer had moved on to pastures new leaving them with an unsustainable wage bill. Does anyone know anything about this? No doubt their promotion had a lot to do with with the big man between the sticks.
Message Thread:
![]()
« Back to thread