Right now, the Constitution, and no longer the will of the King (or Queen), is what matters.
And in the Dutch case, the Constitution talks about 'The King' and that refers to either the entire government (of which the reigning monarch is head) or the person who is the reigning monarch.
When the reigning monarch is a man, and thus King, there is no problem, everyone knows who is meant.
However, when there is a Queen-regnant and her husband is King-Consort (but in day-to-day language, King), it might cause problems in legal matters and so the term Prince is used for the husband of a reigning Queen who is 'King' for constitutional purposes.
This can be fixed easily of course, change the Constitution and change the wording to 'Monarch' or 'government'. In that way, it remains clear who is meant and the husband of a Queen Regnant can be a King-Consort.
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index