Posted by Martin C. on 4/5/2008, 19:07:59, in reply to "Re: Camilla af Rosenborg"
80.161.84.52
--Previous Message--
: --Previous Message--
:
: If "av Rosenborg" is a normal
: surname, and as a married woman she can
: choose to keep her own name, why would she
: need the Queen's consent to use it?
:
: You mean why she needed the Queen's consent
: to use the name for her children? Initially,
: Camilla asked permission in the Ministry for
: Ecclesiastical Affairs, who apparently
: thought it was a grey area question and
: hence advised her to seek the Queen's
: permission. Even if Camilla had received
: permission from the ministry, I think it
: would have been wise of her also to consult
: the Queen out of courtesy.
:
: Stig
:
Why did the Ministry of Church Affairs consider it a grey area? The Rosenborg's are not royal and their surname is a normal surname - even if it's a noble name. Asking the Queen is ofcourse nice, but always seemed a little pompous
Message Thread:
![]()
« Back to thread