Posted by James on 10/19/2007, 2:44 pm, in reply to "Re: Infection Worse than AIDS" The sequential argument is a moot point since "days" would hardly be a large enough amount of time to make any difference in what is predicted, unless you take days as non-literal, which throws its own rather large kinks into the equation. "Creationism's central focus..." From here until the end of the post we have a discussion not about science or the predictive value of creationism, but rather a theological sermon that adds nothing of value to this discussion. "It is when evolution is interpreted to mean that we are merely fancified animals that I diverge" If this is what the evidence tells us, then that is the case. And the only reason to deny this is that one finds the prospect distasteful, discomfitting, or otherwise disgusting and unpalatable.
199.80.67.241
"Creationism does not predict homogeneity in the geologic record. On the contrary, the bible account is one of "days" of creation, sequential."
Message Thread:
« Back to thread