Posted by Lee Russ Your own post pretty much establishes that the ONLy folks claiming that Plame suggested Wilson for te Niger job were the White House crew tasked with smearing Wilson. And, of course, you and the right wing talkers. I have never seen anyone with a bigger double standard of proof than you, my friend. No one. A sigle professor in a single university says something, and to you it's "liberals" up to no good. The collective religious right does something and, to you, it's a few extremists with whom you refuse to be associated. The entire, and I mean entire, intelligence community says Plame was covert and did not suggest Wilson for this job, and you see it as "uncertain" because a White House crew self-servingly claims otherwise. I've asked over and over where your evidence is. The only answer you appear to have is "the White House said so." Good luck with that one. In the time I've contributed to this board, you have many times cavalierly ridiculed liberals, those who worry about "feelings" and those who attempt to keep the public arena free of religion, yet are hypersensitive to criticism of Christians (because of your feelings, I assume). You have regaled us with stories of college students unqualified to run a student newspaper because of their inability to get historical facts right, yet your posts here repeatedly show a total lack of concern with truth and accuracy. This isn't going to change. As I've said too many times to think about, you dislike facts, love abstract theory, and see everything in partisan, black & white, while accusing others of that very trait. I see nothing resembling "communication" here.
on 8/30/2007, 8:00 am, in reply to "Re: Did Plame Send Wilson to Niger?"
75.69.88.150
How exactly? You're very good at the summary assertion, where's the reasoning/evidence/analysis to back it up?
Message Thread:
« Back to thread