Links' Resources Message Board: Re: 2001 vs. 2003

[ Post a Response | Links' Resources Message Board ]

Re: 2001 vs. 2003

Posted by rjw38 on 12/30/2003, 9:31 pm, in reply to "Re: 2001 vs. 2003"
216.208.60.162

--Previous Message--
: I say no...keep your 2001...I like the fact
: that the pros (Palmer, Stadler, etc) are
: photo images rather than the computer
: generated images in 2003 that don't look at
: thing like real people....when Microsoft does
: another version (2005???)...they should go
: back to photo reality....this is a great
: game..I have played it for as long as it has
: been on the market, at least 10 years...but
: 2003 was not an improvement!
: --Previous Message--
: I have Links 2001 and I'm wondering if it's
: worth it to update to 2003. Whay do you guys
: think?
: :
:

Message Thread:

2001 vs. 2003 - Russ Sprouse 7/27/2003, 10:45 am
- Re: 2001 vs. 2003 - farquar 8/1/2003, 9:16 am
  - Re: 2001 vs. 2003 - rjw38 12/30/2003, 9:34 pm
  - Re: 2001 vs. 2003 - rjw38 12/30/2003, 9:31 pm
- Re: 2001 vs. 2003 - farquar 8/1/2003, 9:13 am
« Back to thread

Post a Response

Your Name:
Your Email:

Subject:

Message:

--Previous Message-- : : --Previous Message-- : I say no...keep your 2001...I like the fact : that the pros (Palmer, Stadler, etc) are : photo images rather than the computer : generated images in 2003 that don't look at : thing like real people....when Microsoft : does : another version (2005???)...they should go : back to photo reality....this is a great : game..I have played it for as long as it has : been on the market, at least 10 years...but : 2003 was not an improvement! : --Previous Message-- : I have Links 2001 and I'm wondering if it's : worth it to update to 2003. Whay do you : guys : think? : : : : :

Optional Image URL:

Optional Link Title:
Optional Link URL:

Notify me by email of all message replies.