There have been plenty of people who have been both sane and believers in the Bible. An example would be Karl Stern, the Canadian psychiatrist. He was raised a Jew but turned to atheism then to the Roman Catholic Church. I read his autobiography "Pillar of Fire". Seemed sane to me, certainly not obviously psychotic. Other Bible believers who seemed sane were C S Lewis and Father Richard Neuhaus. The latter wrote superbly rational and witty critiques of contemporary secular culture for the journal "First Things". Neuhaus' religiosity provided the moral motivation for his entertaining essays. If he had been an atheist writing as an apologist for liberal secular society he would have been boring, and probably a liar.
There are lots of things that observational science cannot prove but can still be believed. The strictly private, unobservable events in your consciousness would be an example.
The real problem for religion is other religions: they cannot possibly all be true. If you're in the habit of questioning some then why not doubt the lot of them? Another problem is that some were founded by insane men. Mohammed for example was probably nuts. But that does not make his followers similarly insane. Stupid, gullible and ignorant will do.
« Back to index