[ Post a Response | No Answers in Genesis Discussion Board ]
Posted by gallo on October 14, 2009, 3:47 pm, in reply to "Try "
98.197.134.192
So you got the link right. Now explain how and why the science of each of these people is based on their faith. Just because they do science in unrelated fields doesn't support an argument that evolutionary theory is incorrect. Please explain why research in medical physics, immunology, electrical engineering, psychology, chemistry, statistics, mechanical engineering, dentistry, aeronautics, MRI development, mathematics, and the absolute cappers, "medical research", and "operations research". So what? How is any of the research of these people relevant to the mythology of the Bible and the reality of evolutionary theory? Please be specific.
Creation scientists don't do science. Creationists can do science as long as their science is irrelevant to the question of creation vs. science.
Steve Austin??? Give me a break.
Are you aware that the "Steve List" is many times longer than your list of so called "creationist" scientists. About 1% of qualified scientists are named Steve, Steven, Stephen, Stephanie, or some variant. So far 1114 Steves have rejected creationism in favor of evolutionary biology. The list was begun in honor of Stephen Jay Gould. One signer is Stephen Hawking.
So, after you figure out how many of your creationist scientists actually base their research on the Bible, how long is that list?
Message Thread:
« Back to thread