[ Post a Response | No Answers in Genesis Discussion Board ]
Posted by Walter on July 1, 2009, 9:37 am, in reply to "Interesting"
67.173.65.230
>>I'm sure it has been covered many times but this is an argument that appeals only to those that imagine themselves smart enough to understand everything.<<
Speaking of bad arguments, considering that Darwinists use the "all the FACTS are in" argument all the time to justify THEIR theory, your "argument" rings rather hollow.
>>In other words, the lack of imagination on the part of one person should not necessarily, indicate, that something is impossible.<<
Getting post-modern on us are we? If you imagine yourself able to fly like Superman and I say its impossible is that a "lack of imagination" on my part? No. Its an utter lack of understanding on your part of the laws of physics, aerodynamics and other scientific laws on your part.
Not only is your argument bad, the underlying assumptions you robotically use to base your bad argument on are themselves bad.
>>Things can be difficult to divine, not being able to succinctly define how a thunderstorm forms does make every thunderstorm an act of God.<<
No one said that every thing that happens is an act of God. Lying (which you've just done) is also a poor form of argumentation.
>>To me this seems to be an bad argument, on par with "it's magic, you can't understand it"<<
Bullshit. Forensics, archaeology and many other forms of science use the same techniques to identify intelligent design from random chance all the time. Continuing your inane "argumentation" you have just called these sciences "magic".
>>But perhaps I am mistaken.<<
I am happy to agree with you on this point.
>>In any event the process of the evolution of the flagellum is well explained.<<
Bullshit. The process of the "evolution" of the flagellum is not explained. That makes two lies in one post. Nice going.
Message Thread:
« Back to thread