
| BaseballHQ.com | BOTTOM LINE SUBSCRIBER FORUM |
Posted by Jon@HQ on 6/11/2003, 9:29 pm, in reply to "Re: Borchard/Baldelli (Even if Baldelli was $20 through 2004???)" --Previous Message--
While I mostly agree with thg, it also matters whether you're trying to win now. If you are trying to win, then it's an easy call to trade Borchard for Baldelli. If he helps you in 2004 - and I'm inclined to think he would, for the reasons thg cites - then that's gravy. And if you don't want him in 2004, then trade him this winter.
: It's not about how much you spend but how much
: return you get on that money. So what if
: you spend $78 if you're getting $150 in
: performance? In fact, going into an
: inflated auction, you prefer to have as
: much money as possible tied up in
: pre-inflation value.
: Tim
: --Previous Message--
: keeper league and baldelli would be $20
: through
: 2004, then $5 for each year want to keep
: him, is it worth it then? i'm still
: leaning toward yes, but with my $60
: pitching budget - that then cuts into my
: $200 hitting - way to early go guess next
: year already - but keeping baldelli at $20
: would push me to $78 in keepers
:
: (broussard/rivas/a-rod/crede/eckstein/baldelli)
: - i like the speed aspect there with
: rivas/eckstein/baldelli
: --Previous Message--
: I would trade Borchard in order to get
: Baldelli. Baldelli has proved himself in
: the Majors thus far, whereas Borchard has
: not. I did rank Borchard ahead of
: Baldelli in the top 100, and right now,
: that looks like a mistake on my part. I
: really though Borchard would take that
: step this year and that Baldelli would
: come back to earth.
: --Previous Message--
: In an earlier post about Borchard....the
: notion
: that "The good ones come
: quickly" was proffered.
: Do you agree?
: Would you trade Borchard for Baldelli?
: :
: :
:
Message Thread:
![]()
« Back to thread
Return to Baseball HQ Bottom Line home page